Occupational Therapy Philosophy

* - occupational Therapy Integrating Art and Science * - * - What is occupational therapy? How does one define the job and validate its worth in the health check field? Since its modelion as an established health care traffic, occupational therapys philosophy has been defined, redefined, and refined.In their writings esteemed occupational Therapists bloody shame Reilly and Susan Peloquin tin their own critical and re potary ideas of occupational therapys worth, the staple fibre acquire it fulfills, and its proceeds to the healthcare profession. Both women ask their peers to refine what is rumly inherent somewhat occupational therapy and by doing so validate the professions parcel in serving the needs of homosexual (Reilly, 1963 Peloquin,2002). * -In her 1962 Eleanor Clarke Slagle address entitled, Occupational Therapy back Be One Of The Great Ideas of 20th Century Medicine Mary Reilly (1962) challenges her fellow colleagues to critically define Occupational Therapys valu e at bottom the medical field. She initiates this critique by first asking the provocative question, Is Occupational Therapy a sufficiently vital and singular service for medicine to defy and society to reward (Reilly,1962, p. 3)?Reilly suggests it is precisely these critical questions and line of discourse that we as practitioners need to be embracing to maintain our unique and vital share to the healthcare realm. * - Drawing inspiration from Occupational therapys earliest visions Suzanne M. Peloquin to a fault seeks to engage her audience by asking to consider and reflect upon a varied but equally important component that makes occupational therapy unique and vital to the health of man.Quoting Ora Ruggles,an early contributor to the field of occupational therapy, Peloquin writes, It is not large to give a patient something to do with his hands. You must go for the heart as well as the hands. Its the heart that in truth does the healing (Peloquin,2002). Through the intent of visual imagery and storytelling Peloquin calls our attention to the professions earliest founders and their visionary beliefs. Peloquin eloquently reminds us of the healing superpower of the heart and the vital aspect of affectionateness that is inherent and needful in our profession. - Further more than, Peloquin maintains that when we undertake an integrative cash advance employing both competency and caring in healing we solidify our value as a profession (Peloquin 2012). She demonstrates this when she writes, ternary constructs deeply rooted in our professions culture and intact to its central character are well-presented in the early vision integration, occupation, and caring(Peloquin,1962,p. 525).In contrast, Reilly engages her audience by putting forth a mandate that charges the practitioners of occupational therapy to validate the profession by inviting and seeking critical appraisal. When a headmaster organization as a whole accepts criticism as the imposing mode of thought, then indeed, theorizing flourishes and the intellectual atmosphere of their gatherings, is characterized by sweeping controversies. In this atmosphere of controversy, progress becomes somewhat assured (Reilly, 1962, p. 3). * -In addition to engaging in critical debate Reilly believes that in order to establish credibility and worth, Occupational Therapy must strive to identify and define the vital need of man which we serve and the manner in which we serve it(Reilly p. 3). In this academic and fact-finding tone, Reilly delivers her lecture in a clear and orderly fashion. Her writing is epigrammatic and articulate as she methodically introduces an hypothesis in which postulates That man, through the use of his hands, as they are energized by mind and will, can influence the say of his own health (Reilly,1962,p. ). She formulates this theory and tests it by drawing upon a multi-discipline access code to research (Reilly, 1962). She charges her colleagues with the mand ate to define mans basic need for occupation in a scientific researchable manner and atmosphere. It is not enough to draw upon multiple disciplines such(prenominal) as the social sciences, biology, and neurophysiology, Reilly suggests we must alike observe the anthropological , social, and biological study of occupation through phylogenetic and ontogenetic lenses Reilly,1962,p. 10) . Through this study of occupation and the therapeutic meaning of invent Reilly defines a unique aspect of occupational therapy the profound understanding of the reputation of work (Reilly,1962,p. 9). Her thesis in this thought provoking address, her take habitation message, is so powerful that Peloquin describes Reillys hypothesis of human occupation as one of the professions best visionary statements(Peloquin,1962,p. 518). * -In contrast to Mary Reillys spur to attain a scientific understanding of mans basic need for occupation, Peloquins reminiscent recalling of early visions of occupational thera pys goals and unique attributes highlights the profession philosophy of meaningful and blueprintful work in a client-centered modality of care. Incorporating the art of caring in our treatment paired with the all-encompassing wealth of knowledge gleaned across multiple disciplines enables us as practitioners to pass away the patient toward the occupation of living or as Peloquin puts it give us to see individuals occupying their lives and living well (Peloquin,2002,p. 24). * - Reilly also strongly embraces an integrated approach and outlines the importance of maintaining a individual or client-centered approach when assigning treatment. Her condemnation of formulaic activity groups prescribed as therapy used in psychiatric settings in the 1960s is detailed best when she writes, activity programs so designed, tilt to depersonalize,institutionalize and, in general, debase human nature (Reilly,1962,p. 12). * -In their vastly different writings, different in style, in delivery and different in focus, these women have a common concern, passion, and desire for the preservation of occupational therapy. Mary Reilly aims to mark the profession as vital by focusing our attention to the distinctive step that occupational therapy holds the unique speciality of defining the value ofwork to man. (Reilly, 1962). It is this concept and the critical engagement from which great ideas such as this stems, are necessary in ensuring a professional organizations existence in these active and emanding times. Suzanne Peloquin also believes that occupational therapys attributes are unique and standout from others in the healthcare field. The uniqueness that Peloquin refers to and asks her readers to preserve and incorporate in our practice is the macrocosm members early vision of caring and empathy. She writes, To see police van engaged is to see personal actualization, an occupational link with identity, a fashioning of meaning.The depiction transcends more limited visions of activity or productivity and allow us to see individuals occupying their lives(Peloquin,1962,p524). * - In an attempt to integrate Peloquins vision and Reillys hypothesis I refer to Peloquins remark, Occupational therapy is not about balancing at some midpoint between ii dimensions of practice, with either heart or hands getting about one-half of a practitioners attention it is about reaching for both (Peloquin,1962,p. 522).Reilly collaborates this sentiment writing, And more than all this, it implies that man, through the use of his hands, can creatively deploy his thinking, feelings and purpose to make himself at home in the beingness and to make the world his home (Reilly,1962,p. 2). It is precisely this distinctive blending of visionary statements and scientific exploration that lends occupational its unique * - vitality and credibility. Leaders in the field such as Peloquin, and Reilly inspire, shape and preserve the richness and dignity of the important dynamic nature of our field.