Leadership model Essay

Discuss what attractionship theory/ m onetime(a) you would use as a wellness care leader and the theory/ seat you consider is least effective. Explain why the models youve selected would or would not work in a healthcare field. Among a dozens of leading theory/models listed in the book of leadership for health master copys, I would like to say that Benniss competency-based model of leadership is most effective one in the health care field, while marks charismatic leadership model is least one. Bennis competency-based model has been widely embraced by professional organizations. This model suggests that the skills and tools infallible to lead organizations must be learned-whether through incremental on-the-job training, nut study, or years of professional development. It implies that leaders are made and not simply born. To become tame of any(prenominal) plane sections of medical checkup portion, one evictnot in effect hold such a position without years of medical educati on and a successful practice of medicine because the crystalize diagnosis and kosher treatment for patients are the fundamental goal of all hospitals. The competent leader is a key point to r to each one this goal. Lets move the department of pathology and laboratory medicine as an example.The department of pathology has several division including clinical pathology, functional pathology and blood banking. Each division has several subdivisions. For example, surgical pathology includes microscopy diagnosis made by pathologist, grossing surgical specimen performed by pathologists suspensors, and tissue slides prepared by histotechnologists. The head of department of pathology is evermore held by pathologists rather than pathologist assistants or histotechnologists. Why? The answer is it is pathologists who bewilder finished 4 years medical prepare education, 5-years resident and fellowship training and many years of practices. During the study in medical school and training in hospitals, Patholgosits go through all divisions and subdivisions in the department of pathology, they knew how to make diagnosis, how to dissect the specimen, how to get the tissue section, how to perform flow cytometry , how to trammel the blood crossmatching. Therefore, whenever there are technical problems which other(a) staffs cannot resolve, Pathologist is equal to do it. Moreover, because pathologists know how each division functions, they can manage the work flow well, coordinate the each division and understand the tough issues in eachdivision.For instance, they know the difficulty to cut the bone sample, they would not demand the unadulterated bone slides which made by technologists. On the other hand, Pathologsits assistant and histotechnologist spends only 2 and 1 year studying in special(prenominal) fields of either grossing or microtoming, respectively. They dont know how other divisions works. Thus, it is hard for them to lead the department of pathology. In t erms of Houses charismatic leadership model, I think it would not work in the healthcare field. First of all, unlike competency-based model which can be metric by the leaders education background and working experience, charismatic leadership inspires followership through intangibles in personality that cannot be measured by any tangible property in a universal way. Similar to the old adage beauty is in the eye of the beholder, charisma is in the eye of the beholder.Therefore, levels of acceptance and acknowledgement cannot be uniformly communicated by the members of the organization. Without the professional skill and profound knowledge in the field of healthcare, the leadership can be challenged and questioned by staffs who are not the beholder. Secondly, the charismatic leadership model suggests that the charismatic leaders are born with this quality. It is very difficult for those without congenital charisma to mimic those who possess this natural ability on the long-run basi s. Its important for leaders in the fields of politics and backup to possess Charismatic personality, for example, President John F Kennedy who inspired trust, opinion and confidence in nonmechanical ways.However, JFK would not be successful chair of department of pathology because he would lack professional discourse in the medical field and could not solve the technical problems to make a correct diagnosis. All in all, each leadership theory/model has its saturation and weakness, as well as applications for use. As far as I am concerned, Bennis competency-based model is the most applicable to leading health organizations, whereas Houses charismatic leadership model is least effective way.