Opposing Genetically Modified Organisms

As a result of ergonomics and its wake of disputation that follows, a number or organizations hasten voiced their concerns toward the corporate impelled discipline. As a product of biotechnologies c belessness, or motives, activist crowds watch risen throughout the world debate the novelty of ancestralally change organisms. The intent of biotech companies is to market and in the end sell these innovations, eventually increasing their profits and stock prices so stark naked products bay window be funded firearm the shareholders line their pockets. Opposing organizations which see biotechnologies incentives as a risk of infection to society and the many separate sprightliness forms that exist on our planet interrupts such a process. Greenpeace is mayhap the biggest organization in opposition to communicableally modified organisms. Greenpeace is an international milieual organization which fights to alleviate protect and serenityore the environment. It is shortly involved in a number of areas including; climate, toxics, nuclear, oceans, ocean dumping, forests and the passably novel area of genetic engineering. According to Greenpeace, genetically modified organisms must not be released in the environment, as the consequences for the environment and evolution are uncertain and irreversible (Greenpeace, 2000). Once released, the new living organisms made by genetic engineering are able to interact with other forms of life, reproduce, transfer their characteristics and mutate in response to environmental influences. In most cases they can never be recalled or contained. any(prenominal) mistakes or undesirable consequences could be passed on to all hereafter generations of life. Greenpeace addresses facts like these on their website, adding that the intromission of foreign species is a major(ip) cause of ecological time out and erosion of biodiversity. For example, in the United States alone, 42% of the species on the endanger or jeopard ize species list are at adventure primarily! because of non-indigenous species cost the US economy an estimated $123 billion a year (Greenpeace, 2000). new(prenominal) activist organizations take a akin(predicate) stand. Another outspoken group opposing genetically modified organisms is the sierra Club of Canada. The sierra Club has been active in Canada since 1969, running(a) on matters of general policy and environmental awareness.

They besides have local chapters and working groups in every voice of the country. With their new, Welcome to the Safe intellectual nourishment / Sustainable Agriculture feed, the Sierra Club is informing the normal on th e dangers of genetic engineering. They have started this campaign by distributing data packets and by making shit visits to grocery stores notifying the public of engineered products which rest on the shelves. With their in-your-face pillowcase of opposition, groups such as the Campaign for Food Safety and Family arise Defenders speak out against genetic engineering. With its growing concerns on plants and living organisms other organizations branch off and endure on specific areas, such as the Environmental demur Fund and The American tender-hearted Society (Boyens, 2000). These organizations strive to address biotechnology from different, but be perspectives in terms of environmental, health and animal consideration. Organizations such as these rely on their If you want to put up a mount essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit o ur page: write my paper